Dark Mode Light Mode

Amazon slammed for silence on Gaza hostage employee Alexander Troufanov

Alexander Sasha Troufanov, 29, from Tel Aviv, was abducted during the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack on Kibbutz Nir Oz while visiting his family. His mother Yelena, grandmother Irina, and partner Sapir Cohen were also taken. His father was killed that day.

While his family was released in November 2023, Troufanov remained in Islamic Jihad captivity for nearly 500 days until his release on Saturday. Amazon, where he worked as an artificial intelligence chip engineer, offered no public support for efforts to secure his freedom.

Amazon’s silence drew widespread criticism. Major global corporations often express solidarity with employees in crisis, but Amazon made no mention of Troufanov’s abduction in official statements. Reports suggested that management advised employees to avoid public support, seen as an attempt to maintain neutrality.

Russian-Israeli Sasha (Alexander) Troufanov, a hostage held in Gaza since the deadly October 7, 2023 attack, is escorted by Islamic Jihad militants as part of a ceasefire and a hostages-prisoners swap deal between Hamas and Israel in Khan Younis, in the southern Gaza Strip, February 15, 2025. (credit: Hatem Khaled/Reuters)

Amazon’s inaction

In Israel, Amazon employees independently displayed signs calling for Troufanov’s release, organized awareness campaigns, and joined protests. Despite their efforts, Amazon took no official steps to support its employee held under harsh conditions in Gaza. After his release, Amazon issued a brief statement expressing “relief at his return” but offered no empathy for Troufanov or his family.

Amazon’s inaction outraged its Israeli employees and the public. Social activists condemned the silence, comparing it to other global firms that have shown clear support for employees in similar situations. Critics viewed Amazon’s response as deliberate indifference.

With Troufanov now free, questions linger: Was Amazon’s silence a calculated business decision to avoid political conflict or a sign of corporate detachment from its employees’ hardships? Either way, its inaction sets a concerning precedent for international corporations facing employee crises.





This article was originally published at www.jpost.com

Keep Up to Date with the Most Important News

Previous Post
Campus Reform the #1 Source for College News

Campus Reform the #1 Source for College News

Next Post

Christian broadcaster calls for Christian value-infused media

The American Salient
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.