American universities stand at a historic crossroads. After decades of strong progressive policies, progressivism has become the status quo.
Universities have drifted so far to the left that they have lost all connection to their roots. When it’s easier to find a dissident in Iran than a Republican at Harvard University, it’s a clear sign that intellectual conformity has reached a point where it undermines the very justification of universities as centers of knowledge.
It was only a matter of time before a politician would demand that public funds—poured in staggering amounts into a system that promotes political indoctrination—be redirected toward restoring balance. That moment has arrived. Within weeks, a new administration will enter the White House, and universities’ futures could change.
[RELATED: We Need McMahon to Tombstone Piledrive the ED]
American universities will face an intellectual earthquake. The new policies expected from Trump’s administration—including reducing funding for programs that encourage ideological conformity and promoting legislation to protect free speech on campus—pose an existential challenge to the academic model we have grown accustomed to over recent decades.
Charles Darwin taught us that survival is not about strength but about the ability to adapt. This principle applies equally to social institutions. American universities were built on the pillars of free expression, open inquiry, and equal opportunity. Over time, however, they have become hubs of one-sided criticism, intellectual intolerance, and actions that erode freedom of speech.
To survive these impending changes, universities must ask themselves not how to resist but how to adapt. This is a moment for introspection and the adoption of reforms that will strengthen academia’s core values.
To lead reform, universities should take immediate steps:
1. Shutting Down DEI Departments: DEI departments limit intellectual diversity and debate on campus. Institutions should reallocate these funds to programs that promote open dialogue and academic excellence.
2. Transitioning to Merit-Based Admissions: Universities must create complete transparency in their admissions criteria. A model based on grades, achievements, and individual potential can help rebuild public trust and ensure intellectual diversity that reflects talent rather than racial quotas.
3. Recruiting Ideologically Diverse Scholars: Faculty at many universities lean heavily toward one political ideology, limiting students’ perspectives. Universities should actively recruit scholars with diverse ideological viewpoints, ensuring classrooms become spaces for robust intellectual debate.
4. Diversifying Academic Publishing: Academic journals often reflect a narrow range of perspectives, and many researchers face difficulties publishing work that challenges prevailing narratives. Creating a free market of ideas—where every voice can be heard—will revitalize academic research and improve the quality of scholarly output. Encouraging journals to include viewpoints across the ideological spectrum is a necessary step.
5. Expelling Antisemitism from Campuses: Campuses across the U.S. have become breeding grounds for anti-Semitism, often disguised as free speech and peaceful protests. Jewish students are regularly harassed, intimidated, and excluded simply for their identity or support of Israel. This is unacceptable. Universities must adopt a zero-tolerance policy for anti-Semitic behavior. Any student or group that promotes hatred incites violence or creates a hostile environment for Jewish students must face immediate expulsion.
6. Cutting Off Radical Foreign Funding: Universities must sever ties with foreign funding sources that promote radical agendas, such as financing from countries that advance anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism on U.S. campuses. This is a moral imperative and critical for ensuring genuine academic freedom. Transparency in foreign contributions would further bolster public confidence in these institutions.
[RELATED: The Next President Should . . .]
These trust-building measures align with a broader public call for transparency and fairness in institutions that serve a diverse, democratic society. They will also signal to the new administration that academia is prepared to take criticism seriously and realign with its core values—excellence, critical thinking, and open discourse.
Universities stand at a moment of reckoning. Those who cling to the old structures continue to push one-sided agendas and exclude alternative ideas risk losing their relevance. But institutions that embrace reform can lead the higher education landscape into a new era. By adopting these reforms, universities have the opportunity to survive and thrive as beacons of knowledge and debate in a rapidly evolving world. This is an evolutionary moment. Those who adapt will survive.
Follow Ronen Shoval on X.
Image by Pawe — Adobe Stock — Asset ID#: 934528882
This article was originally published at www.mindingthecampus.org
