Dark Mode Light Mode

Andy McCarthy Says Latest Jack Smith Evidence Dump Could Taint Jury Pool Against Trump

Andy McCarthy Says Latest Jack Smith Evidence Dump Could Taint Jury Pool Against Trump Andy McCarthy Says Latest Jack Smith Evidence Dump Could Taint Jury Pool Against Trump

Former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy said Friday that U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan of D.C. risked prejudicing potential jurors against former President Donald Trump by allowing more of special counsel Jack Smith’s documents to be released.

Chutkan agreed to Smith’s request to allow the public to view four documents totaling over 1,800 pages of potential evidence in Smith’s federal election interference case against Trump. McCarthy said Chutkan’s move proved the case was a “political exercise.” (RELATED: Andy McCarthy Says Jack Smith Wanted Trump ‘Convicted Before Election Day’)

WATCH:

“I’m not curious, because I thought from the beginning this was a political exercise. Now, that doesn’t mean there’s not a case in there someplace, but the timing of this strategically has always been a political exercise,” McCarthy said when asked by “The Story” guest hot Trace Gallagher if he found the timing “curious.” “I have to chuckle when Judge Chutkan says she would not want to let politics or anything like that enter into her decision-making. A judge in a normal case, Trace, would be concerned about the jury pool.”

“Contrary to what Judge Chutkan says, her responsibility is not to the American people writ large to fill the campaign airwaves with new information. Her responsibility is to give Trump a fair trial and make sure the jury pool’s not prejudiced,” McCarthy continued. “And any judge who was making that her north star would be very concerned about releasing this information prior to the election. Jack Smith, if he was a normal prosecutor, if he was serious when he was running around saying that his defendant is a threat to democracy as we know it and could even be a threat to witnesses, the last thing you would do is release all your case if that was what you’re really concerned about.”

Smith secured a superseding indictment against Trump almost two months after the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Trump’s claims of immunity in a case stemming from a previous indictment secured by Smith over the former president’s efforts to challenge the results of the 2020 presidential election.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.



This article was originally published at dailycaller.com

Keep Up to Date with the Most Important News

Add a comment Add a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Previous Post

The Biden-Harris Administration's Dangerous Delusions About Israel's War Against Hamas

Next Post

Oakland Café’s New Menu Items Seemingly Praise Hamas