Dark Mode Light Mode

DOJ Revisits Effort to Censor Whistleblower Ethan Haim

DOJ Revisits Effort to Censor Whistleblower Ethan Haim DOJ Revisits Effort to Censor Whistleblower Ethan Haim

The Department of Justice filed a reply on Tuesday supporting its motion for a gag order against Dr. Ethan Haim, a surgeon indicted by the Biden administration after he blew the whistles on sex change procedures for minors.

“The prosecutors in @eithanhaim’s case are doubling down on their shameless effort to ask the court to censor us and our client on @X,” the Burke Law Group, which is representing Haim, said on X. “We will continue to zealously represent @EithanHaim’s liberty, and now his (and our) First Amendment right to Free Speech.”

Haim initially came forward as an anonymous whistleblower to expose gender treatments being performed on minors at Texas Children’s Hospital in Houston. He is facing four felony counts of violating the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, also known as HIPAA, according to journalist Chris Rufo, who first reported on Haim’s story.

The reply in support of its motion for a gag order said the order would “prevent the defendant and his attorney from making inflammatory and and unfairly prejudiced statements.”

The DOJ did not respond to The Daily Signal’s request for comment about example of what types of speech would and would not be permitted.

“Given the number of such statements readily available online, the defendant’s national platform and increasing prominence, and his avowed intention to continue to make such statements,” the order said, “there is a substantial likelihood of prejudicing the court’s ability to conduct a fair trial.”

The prosecution argues Haim is advancing a “false narrative of government corruption,” which “ignores the facts and evidence.” Yet in the next paragraph, the prosecutors say most of “the defendant’s ire” is focused on the case’s former lead prosecutor, leaving the prosecutors unsure of Haim’s claims are true.

Tina Ansari, the former lead prosecutor against Haim, withdrew from the case on Nov. 21 after conflict of interest concerns.

Ansari’s family runs coffee and tea company FreshBrew Group, whose customers include multiple hospitals in the Texas Medical Center which house Texas Children’s Hospital and Baylor College of Medicine are located.

Ansari’s “close family members have substantial financial and political ties” to Texas Children’s Hospital (TCH) and Baylor College of Medicine (BCM),” Haim’s lawyers wrote in a Nov. 13 letter.

Haim was a resident at the Baylor College of Medicine from June 2018 to June 2023. He worked at Texas Children’s Hospital during part of his residency.

The gag order would “completely prevent Dr. Haim or his counsel from criticizing the prosecution, no matter how correct the criticism,” according to Burke Law Group.

“The prosecution tries to make its case by painting Dr. Haim’s and the defense’s critical tweets as inaccurate,” the X post said. “But as the defense already explained in its own filing, all of the public criticism has been richly deserved. Indeed, many of the tweets included pictures from the court’s transcript showing where it was the court, not the defense, that took issue with the government’s shoddy work.”

It is suspicious that the DOJ filed a motion for a gag order on the same day, Nov. 20, that Ansari withdrew herself from the case, Haim said on X.

“So, my question is this – what do the remaining DOJ prosecutors know about these conflicts and when did they know it?” he asked. “Because if the case against me was brought under conflicted pretenses, the remaining prosecutors cannot cleanse themselves of the odor of corruption by simply kicking Ansari to the curb and continuing on like everything is kosher.”

The DOJ particularly wants to prevent Haim from retweeting allies who have defended him on X like Ethics and Public Policy Center legal expert Ed Whelan; Rep. Dan Crenshaw, R-Texas; journalist Chris Rufo; and psychologist Jordan Peterson, according to Burke Law Group.

Texas Children’s Hospital had 30 child gender transition patients before Texas passed a law prohibiting doctors from providing transgender medical interventions to minors, according to medical watchdog Do No Harm’s database.

The hospital “took away all the public-facing indications that the program was still active,” “but within the hospital, they’re prioritizing it to the highest level,” Haim said.

Haim said in Rufo’s City Journal article that a surgeon implanted a hormone device in an 11-year-old girl who said she identified as a boy three days after the announcement that transgender medical procedures had stopped at the hospital. Multiple colleagues told Haim over the next year they were implanting puberty-blocking devices in minors. 

After revealing this information, two federal agents with the Department of Health and Human Services showed up on Haim’s door, saying the documents he sent to Rufo were published with children’s names, violating HIPAA. But Haim’s lawyers say all patient information was redacted and that HIPAA regulations allow protected information to be disclosed to “prevent or lessen a serious and imminent threat to a person or the public.”

Virginia Allen contributed to this article.



This article was originally published at www.dailysignal.com

Keep Up to Date with the Most Important News

Add a comment Add a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Previous Post
Mother of only British hostage in Gaza fears for her life

Mother of only British hostage in Gaza fears for her life

Next Post
New York Jets Fanbase Hilariously Gets Sent Down Spiral Of Depression After Trump’s UK Ambassador Pick

New York Jets Fanbase Hilariously Gets Sent Down Spiral Of Depression After Trump’s UK Ambassador Pick