The NCAA transfer portal, originally intended to provide athletes with greater freedom, has evolved into a chaotic free agency system with significant consequences for academics and team dynamics. While the portal empowers athletes to escape unfavorable situations or seek better opportunities, it often undermines their educational progress. Many student-athletes struggle with credit transfers, delayed graduations, and a culture that prioritizes sports over academics. At the same time, the portal pressures coaches to continually recruit their own players to prevent departures, creating instability in team rosters. Coupled with the rise of “name, image, and likeness” (NIL) deals, which incentivize athletes to chase financial opportunities, the portal shifts the focus of collegiate athletics further from education. Reflecting on this trend, it’s clear that changes are needed to restore balance and put the “student” back in student-athlete.
According to NCAA data, 8,767 undergraduate and 4,258 graduate student-athletes entered the transfer portal in 2023, a number that continues to grow annually. While the portal grants athletes the ability to escape unfavorable situations or find better opportunities, it comes with significant drawbacks.
[RELATED: Addressing the Mental Health Struggles of Student-Athletes]
Renford Reese, Ph.D., in his article, “The Unintended Consequences of the NCAA College Athletics Transfer Portal,” describes the portal as a “revolving door” that destabilizes the student-athlete experience. One of the core issues is the lack of mandatory orientation sessions that inform athletes about the potential academic and personal pitfalls of transferring. Reese emphasizes the absence of protective guardrails to prevent athletes from making impulsive decisions that could derail their educational progress.
Furthermore, the portal complicates team dynamics for coaches.
As Reese notes, “Coaches’ biggest challenge is having to keep recruiting their student-athletes just to keep them from leaving.” This relentless need to retain players can overwhelm coaches, leading to unstable team rosters and unpredictable seasons. The influx of new players through the portal often disrupts the established flow of a team, forcing coaches to adjust strategies and team chemistry repeatedly. Players who have spent years building rapport with their teammates may find their roles diminished or altered to accommodate incoming transfers, creating friction within the team.
For players, the portal provides leverage against unfair treatment from coaches, such as “doghouse politics,” where minor mistakes can lead to punitive consequences. Reese’s research highlights this shift in power dynamics, stating, “Today, coaches have to be just as conscious and accountable for their behavior as the players. This creates a less dictatorial and more progressive environment for the players.” While this newfound agency benefits athletes, it raises questions about the long-term stability of college programs.
The Division I Council’s recent move to adopt rules allowing athletes to transfer multiple times while retaining immediate eligibility underscores the NCAA’s focus on athletic freedom. However, these changes amplify academic risks. Without policies that prioritize credit transfer equivalency or graduation tracking, student-athletes may fall behind academically, delaying or even jeopardizing their degree completion. Reese aptly summarizes this issue: “The universal reason one attends college is to be a student, and what is lost in the portal fanfare is the stability of the student-athlete’s experience as a student.”
In addition to logistical issues, student-athletes face significant cultural pressures within college athletics. Reese points out that “there are consequences for a player who prioritizes their academics over athletics. For example, a player cannot be late for practice because of a physics lab.” This culture of prioritizing sports over studies creates a tension that undermines the educational mission of universities. If academic pursuits are continually deprioritized, institutions risk becoming mere training grounds for professional sports, eroding their value as centers of learning and personal development.
The current system’s lack of regulations necessitates reform. Potential policies include introducing cooling-off periods, limiting the number of transfers per athlete, and mandating academic counseling sessions before transfer decisions. These measures could help balance athletic freedom with academic integrity, preserving the stability of college sports programs while respecting athletes’ rights to transfer freely.
Higher education institutions must also prioritize academic advising and support for transferring student-athletes. By ensuring that credit transfers are seamless and that athletes are guided toward timely graduation, colleges can uphold their commitment to education. Introducing mandatory orientation sessions for transfer portal applicants that outline their decisions’ academic and athletic implications would provide essential guidance. Additionally, establishing partnerships between athletic departments and academic advisors could help student-athletes better navigate the transfer process.
[RELATED: A Reflection on Violence in College Sports]
While the NCAA transfer portal has undeniably empowered athletes and introduced parity in college sports, it has also created significant challenges for academic stability and team cohesion. Reese’s analysis emphasizes the need for structured policies to guide this evolving landscape. Without intervention, the transfer portal and the growing influence of NIL threaten to undermine the core mission of higher education. To truly prioritize the “student” in student-athletes, it is imperative to implement reforms that balance athletic aspirations with academic commitments.
Higher education must adapt to these changes while reaffirming its educational mission. The portal and NIL have revolutionized collegiate athletics, but with thoughtful policy reforms, universities can ensure that athletes leave with more than just athletic accolades. Rather, they will make certain that athletes can graduate with both a degree and the tools necessary to thrive beyond sports.
Follow Jessi Wynn on X.
Image: moomsabuy — Adobe Stock — Asset ID#: 96614742
This article was originally published at www.mindingthecampus.org
