The jackals at The New York Times finally admit that an unborn baby is just that, a baby. However, only in the context of driving the narrative that birthright citizenship is good and predictably President Donald Trump is bad.
In their piece titled “A New Fear for Undocumented Women: Will My Unborn Child Be a Citizen?” the NY Times profiles several illegal immigrants who fear that their future children won’t be granted birthright citizenship under the 14th Amendment after Trump’s recent E.O.
Throwback To Michael Anton On Tucker Carlson’s Show Making The Argument For Ending Birthright Citizenship For The Children Of Illegal Aliens
“It clearly doesn’t apply to people who aren’t citizens or who were born to people who aren’t citizens who are ‘subject to the… pic.twitter.com/PHy86WwrPR
— The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸 (@ColumbiaBugle) January 21, 2025
In its desire to play on American emotions about illegal immigration, the NY Times exposed its hypocrisy on abortion. Conservatives have long held the belief that all Americans, born or unborn, deserve the right to human dignity. However, the left only uses this line of thinking when they want to champion whatever their anti-American orthodoxy is at the time.
Trump knew that his bold stance on birthright citizenship would come under heavy fire from immigration activists, which is likely why he made it a day-one issue. This sends the 14th Amendment to the courts to decide whether the original intent was to grant citizenship to anyone born in the U.S. or not. Americans have seen birthright citizens weaponized against their own people through illegal immigration in the form of “anchor babies.” (ROOKE: Trump Should Teach The Loony Tunes Left A Lesson After Yesterday’s Prayer Service)
Illegal immigrants will willingly break the law to enter the U.S. in order to have children here, creating a green card pathway. Stopping this practice will prevent millions from using our Constitution against us.
Texas Republican Rep. Brian Babin introduced the Birthright Citizenship Act in December. He says it will “build on President Trump’s executive order and codify these critical reforms into law.”
🚨 I just introduced the Birthright Citizenship Act! This bill will build on President Trump’s executive order and codify these critical reforms into law.
It’s time to END the exploitation of loopholes in our immigration system. pic.twitter.com/KfBgc2aggm
— Brian Babin (@RepBrianBabin) January 21, 2025
Babin wants to close the “loopholes” in the 14th Amendment that drive millions of illegal immigrants to the U.S.
Arizona Republican Rep. Andy Biggs told reporters that the “gift” of U.S. citizenship should not be given “to those who abuse our laws.” (ROOKE: Trump Sticks Knife Into Architects Of America’s Decline – Right To Their Faces)
“The Framers of the 14th Amendment would be appalled at how abused the notion of ‘birthright citizenship’ is today,” Biggs posted on X. “The privilege of United States citizenship is a priceless and profound gift. It should not be granted to those who abuse our laws.”
The Framers of the 14th Amendment would be appalled at how abused the notion of “birthright citizenship” is today.
The privilege of United States citizenship is a priceless and profound gift.
It should not be granted to those who abuse our laws. pic.twitter.com/4avBB03LQn
— Rep Andy Biggs (@RepAndyBiggsAZ) January 23, 2025
Senior Legal Fellow at the Heritage Foundation, Amy Swearer, similarly argued against the modern interpretation of birthright citizenship, saying “[T]hat basically no one for the first 100 years after the 14th Amendment’s ratification thought that it mandated birthright citizenship for the U.S.-born children of illegal or nonimmigrant aliens.” (ROOKE: Trump Has A Plan To Rescue LA From The Democrats)
“The idea that birthright citizenship applies to anyone but the children of lawfully present permanent residents is a modern re-interpretation. Even as late as 1924, the legal and academic consensus was that the Citizenship Clause was meant to be far more restrictive,” Swearer added.
The idea that birthright citizenship applies to anyone but the children of lawfully present permanent residents is a modern re-interpretation. Even as late as 1924, the legal and academic consensus was that the Citizenship Clause was meant to be far more restrictive. pic.twitter.com/dMmeo9MMZX
— Amy Swearer (@AmySwearer) January 21, 2025
The NY Times’ failed sermon on birthright citizenship is the first of many from corrupt media outlets seeking to turn Americans against their own interests. Illegal immigrants broke our laws to come here. They (or their children) should not be given special privileges for doing so.
The left can’t continue to push their anti-human talking points while also calling for so-called “humane” immigration policies. A majority of Americans view illegal immigration as a top issue for the Trump administration. If they want to emotionally manipulate Americans on the topic, they must first decide whether they believe a pregnant woman is carrying a baby or a clump of cells.
Until then, their attempts to propagandize left-wing views on illegal immigration, birthright citizenship and deportations should be ignored.
This article was originally published at dailycaller.com
